China, Hong Kong SAR vs Gambia: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Gambia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
99th
Gambia rank
99th

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Gambia
-1000100200300400199120042017

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Gambia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Gambia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Gambia ranks 99th of 175 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Gambia Difference Ahead
1990s 7.35 % change on previous year 8.87 % change on previous year 1.52 % change on previous year Gambia
2000s -93.58 % change on previous year -3.8 % change on previous year 89.78 % change on previous year Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Gambia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Gambia as of 2017.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Gambia?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Gambia?
11 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2001.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Gambia rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Gambia ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Gambia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/gambia-the/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Gambia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.