China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kenya: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Kenya
-96.62 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
99th
Kenya rank
98th

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Kenya
-2000200400600800199120072024

How they compare

Kenya currently reports -96.62 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 3.38 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Kenya ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Kenya ranks 98th of 175 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Kenya Difference Ahead
1990s 7.35 % change on previous year 48.21 % change on previous year 40.87 % change on previous year Kenya
2000s 47.55 % change on previous year 115.34 % change on previous year 67.79 % change on previous year Kenya
2010s -78.96 % change on previous year 200.27 % change on previous year 279.24 % change on previous year Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Kenya?
Kenya, at -96.62 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya?
3.38 % change on previous year, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya?
23 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2017.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Kenya rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Kenya ranks 98th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kenya: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/kenya/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Kenya: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.