China, Hong Kong SAR vs Lithuania: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
Lithuania
-100 % change on previous year
in 2021
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
99th
Lithuania rank
99th
Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Lithuania
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lithuania, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Lithuania ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Lithuania ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.14 % change on previous year | -25 % change on previous year | 31.14 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2000s | 121.12 % change on previous year | -37.85 % change on previous year | 158.97 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | -92.87 % change on previous year | -50 % change on previous year | 42.87 % change on previous year | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or Lithuania?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lithuania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
- 0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2015.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Lithuania rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and Lithuania ranks 99th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.