China, Hong Kong SAR vs New Zealand: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

China, Hong Kong SAR
-100 % change on previous year
in 2017
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
99th
New Zealand rank
99th

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • New Zealand
-1000100200300400199120062022

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and New Zealand ranks 99th of 175 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 7.35 % change on previous year -9.54 % change on previous year 16.88 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 32.06 % change on previous year -79.08 % change on previous year 111.14 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s -100 % change on previous year 99.69 % change on previous year 199.69 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), China, Hong Kong SAR or New Zealand?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in New Zealand as of 2017.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between China, Hong Kong SAR and New Zealand?
0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and New Zealand?
14 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2012.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and New Zealand rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 99th and New Zealand ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs New Zealand: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/new-zealand/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs New Zealand: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.