Ecuador vs Eswatini: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Ecuador
255.57 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini
227.8 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ecuador rank
11th
Eswatini rank
13th

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Ecuador
  • Eswatini
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 255.57 % change on previous year against 227.8 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 27.77 % change on previous year.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Eswatini ahead.

Ecuador ranks 11th and Eswatini ranks 13th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s -4.46 % change on previous year 34.13 % change on previous year 38.59 % change on previous year Eswatini
2000s 73.41 % change on previous year 23.85 % change on previous year 49.57 % change on previous year Ecuador
2010s 110.41 % change on previous year 12.96 % change on previous year 97.44 % change on previous year Ecuador
2020s 36.27 % change on previous year 33.32 % change on previous year 2.94 % change on previous year Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Ecuador or Eswatini?
Ecuador, at 255.57 % change on previous year against 227.8 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Ecuador and Eswatini?
27.77 % change on previous year, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eswatini?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Eswatini rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Ecuador ranks 11th and Eswatini ranks 13th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eswatini: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/ecuador/eswatini/">Ecuador vs Eswatini: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.