Mauritius vs Namibia: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2000
Namibia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Mauritius rank
99th
Namibia rank
99th

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Mauritius
  • Namibia
-2000200400600199120042018

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Namibia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 99th of 175 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 69.44 % change on previous year 25.29 % change on previous year 44.15 % change on previous year Mauritius
2000s -100 % change on previous year -6.21 % change on previous year 93.79 % change on previous year Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Mauritius or Namibia?
Mauritius, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2000.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Mauritius and Namibia?
0 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2000.
How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Mauritius ranks 99th and Namibia ranks 99th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/namibia/">Mauritius vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.