Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Portugal
433.01 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
357.52 % change on previous year
in 2024
Portugal rank
4th
Zimbabwe rank
6th

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Portugal
  • Zimbabwe
0200400600199120072024

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 433.01 % change on previous year against 357.52 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 75.49 % change on previous year.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Portugal ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 5.34 % change on previous year 49.52 % change on previous year 44.18 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s -23.33 % change on previous year -6.08 % change on previous year 17.25 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2010s 180.15 % change on previous year 39.79 % change on previous year 140.36 % change on previous year Portugal
2020s 68 % change on previous year 63.26 % change on previous year 4.74 % change on previous year Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Portugal or Zimbabwe?
Portugal, at 433.01 % change on previous year against 357.52 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Portugal and Zimbabwe?
75.49 % change on previous year, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Zimbabwe?
31 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Portugal and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?
Portugal ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 6th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/portugal/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/portugal/zimbabwe/">Portugal vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,366 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.