Armenia vs Czechia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Armenia
0 t
in 2024
Czechia
0 t
in 2024
Armenia rank
98th
Czechia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Armenia
- Czechia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Czechia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 98th and Czechia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 528.25 t | 23.11 t | 505.14 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 294.87 t | 85.29 t | 209.58 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 184.36 t | 56.86 t | 127.51 t | Armenia |
| 2020s | 453.75 t | 28.43 t | 425.32 t | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Armenia or Czechia?
- Armenia, at 0 t against 0 t in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Armenia and Czechia?
- 0 t, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Czechia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Czechia rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Armenia ranks 98th and Czechia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.