Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
442,661 t
in 2024
Bangladesh
281,206 t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
24th
Bangladesh rank
27th

Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Bangladesh
020.0M40.0M60.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 442,661 t against 281,206 t in Bangladesh, a difference of 161,455 t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.6 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Bangladesh ranks 27th of 220 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Bangladesh Difference Ahead
1990s 19.76 million t 101,318 t 19.65 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 4.36 million t 218,891 t 4.14 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 1.71 million t 143,251 t 1.57 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 940,007 t 192,262 t 747,745 t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Bangladesh?
Australia and New Zealand, at 442,661 t against 281,206 t in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh?
161,455 t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Bangladesh rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 24th and Bangladesh ranks 27th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/bangladesh/">Australia and New Zealand vs Bangladesh: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.