Austria vs Botswana: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Austria
0 t
in 2024
Botswana
0 t
in 2024
Austria rank
98th
Botswana rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Austria
- Botswana
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Botswana, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Botswana ahead.
Austria ranks 98th and Botswana ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Botswana in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 67.62 t | 3.71 million t | 3.71 million t | Botswana |
| 2000s | 234.48 t | 572,858 t | 572,624 t | Botswana |
| 2010s | 85.24 t | 0 t | 85.24 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 14.21 t | 0 t | 14.21 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Austria or Botswana?
- Austria, at 0 t against 0 t in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Austria and Botswana?
- 0 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Botswana?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Botswana rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Austria ranks 98th and Botswana ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.