Austria vs Eritrea: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Austria
0 t
in 2024
Eritrea
0 t
in 2024
Austria rank
98th
Eritrea rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Austria
- Eritrea
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Austria ranks 98th and Eritrea ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 48.3 t | 4,130 t | 4,082 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 234.48 t | 182.37 t | 52.11 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 85.24 t | 0 t | 85.24 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 14.21 t | 0 t | 14.21 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Austria or Eritrea?
- Austria, at 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Austria and Eritrea?
- 0 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Eritrea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Eritrea rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Austria ranks 98th and Eritrea ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.