Austria vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Austria
0 t
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 t
in 2024
Austria rank
98th
Kazakhstan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Austria
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.35 t | 149,788 t | 149,731 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 234.48 t | 15,827 t | 15,593 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 85.24 t | 1,600 t | 1,515 t | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 14.21 t | 3,682 t | 3,668 t | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Austria or Kazakhstan?
- Austria, at 0 t against 0 t in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Austria and Kazakhstan?
- 0 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Kazakhstan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Austria ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.