Belgium-Luxembourg vs Czechia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Belgium-Luxembourg
0 t
in 1999
Czechia
0 t
in 2024
Belgium-Luxembourg rank
98th
Czechia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Czechia
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Czechia, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 98th and Czechia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Belgium-Luxembourg or Czechia?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 0 t against 0 t in Czechia as of 1999.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechia?
- 0 t, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Czechia rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 98th and Czechia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.