Botswana vs Lithuania: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Botswana
0 t
in 2024
Lithuania
0 t
in 2024
Botswana rank
98th
Lithuania rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Botswana
- Lithuania
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 98th and Lithuania ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.33 million t | 196.3 t | 4.33 million t | Botswana |
| 2000s | 572,858 t | 1,025 t | 571,834 t | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0 t | 92.51 t | 92.51 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 t | 42.7 t | 42.7 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Botswana or Lithuania?
- Botswana, at 0 t against 0 t in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Botswana and Lithuania?
- 0 t, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Lithuania rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Botswana ranks 98th and Lithuania ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.