Chile vs South Sudan: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Chile
34,288 t
in 2024
South Sudan
33,795 t
in 2024
Chile rank
53rd
South Sudan rank
54th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Chile
- South Sudan
How they compare
Chile currently reports 34,288 t against 33,795 t in South Sudan, a difference of 493 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 53rd and South Sudan ranks 54th of 220 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 76,860 t | 57,015 t | 19,845 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 63,750 t | 41,025 t | 22,725 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Chile or South Sudan?
- Chile, at 34,288 t against 33,795 t in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Chile and South Sudan?
- 493 t, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Chile and South Sudan rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Chile ranks 53rd and South Sudan ranks 54th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.