China, Hong Kong SAR vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 t
in 2024
Rwanda
70.52 t
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
98th
Rwanda rank
97th

Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Rwanda
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020072024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 70.52 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 70.52 t.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Rwanda ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 97th of 220 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 652.13 t 19,674 t 19,022 t Rwanda
2000s 813.36 t 2,540 t 1,727 t Rwanda
2010s 371.92 t 35.26 t 336.66 t China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0 t 42.31 t 42.31 t Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, China, Hong Kong SAR or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 70.52 t against 0 t in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda?
70.52 t, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Rwanda rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 97th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/rwanda/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Rwanda: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.