Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues

Costa Rica
41,870 t
in 2024
Ecuador
46,392 t
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
49th
Ecuador rank
48th

Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199020072024

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 46,392 t against 41,870 t in Costa Rica, a difference of 4,522 t.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 49th and Ecuador ranks 48th of 220 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 27,744 t 12,137 t 15,607 t Costa Rica
2000s 22,518 t 9,742 t 12,777 t Costa Rica
2010s 41,610 t 17,630 t 23,980 t Costa Rica
2020s 37,223 t 29,027 t 8,197 t Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Costa Rica or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 46,392 t against 41,870 t in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Costa Rica and Ecuador?
4,522 t, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ecuador?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Ecuador rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
Costa Rica ranks 49th and Ecuador ranks 48th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/costa-rica/ecuador/">Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.