Cuba vs Malawi: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Cuba
97,150 t
in 2024
Malawi
132,552 t
in 2024
Cuba rank
41st
Malawi rank
38th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Cuba
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 132,552 t against 97,150 t in Cuba, a difference of 35,402 t.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.4 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malawi ahead.
Cuba ranks 41st and Malawi ranks 38th of 220 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 104,580 t | 462,503 t | 357,923 t | Malawi |
| 2000s | 96,288 t | 225,625 t | 129,337 t | Malawi |
| 2010s | 72,108 t | 158,194 t | 86,087 t | Malawi |
| 2020s | 130,842 t | 135,785 t | 4,943 t | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Cuba or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 132,552 t against 97,150 t in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Cuba and Malawi?
- 35,402 t, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malawi?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Malawi rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Cuba ranks 41st and Malawi ranks 38th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.