Eritrea vs Libya: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Eritrea
0 t
in 2024
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Eritrea rank
98th
Libya rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Eritrea
- Libya
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Libya, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 98th and Libya ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,130 t | 23.63 t | 4,106 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 182.37 t | 0 t | 182.37 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Eritrea or Libya?
- Eritrea, at 0 t against 0 t in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Eritrea and Libya?
- 0 t, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Libya rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Eritrea ranks 98th and Libya ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.