Estonia vs Namibia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Estonia
0 t
in 2024
Namibia
0 t
in 2024
Estonia rank
98th
Namibia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Estonia
- Namibia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Namibia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.
Estonia ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 526.87 t | 666,889 t | 666,362 t | Namibia |
| 2000s | 2,531 t | 101,263 t | 98,732 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 320.48 t | 115.54 t | 204.94 t | Estonia |
| 2020s | 71.22 t | 0 t | 71.22 t | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Estonia or Namibia?
- Estonia, at 0 t against 0 t in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Estonia and Namibia?
- 0 t, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Namibia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Namibia rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Estonia ranks 98th and Namibia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.