Eswatini vs South Sudan: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Eswatini
17,362 t
in 2024
South Sudan
33,795 t
in 2024
Eswatini rank
56th
South Sudan rank
54th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Eswatini
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 33,795 t against 17,362 t in Eswatini, a difference of 16,433 t.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.9 times Eswatini's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 56th and South Sudan ranks 54th of 220 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9,653 t | 57,015 t | 47,362 t | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 8,599 t | 41,025 t | 32,426 t | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Eswatini or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 33,795 t against 17,362 t in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 16,433 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Eswatini and South Sudan rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Eswatini ranks 56th and South Sudan ranks 54th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.