Fiji vs Finland: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Fiji
0 t
in 2024
Finland
0 t
in 2024
Fiji rank
98th
Finland rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Fiji
- Finland
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Finland, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Fiji ranks 98th and Finland ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Fiji averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,086 t | 1,618 t | 531.35 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 1,008 t | 5,472 t | 4,465 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 1,545 t | 1,781 t | 236.28 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 282.4 t | 270.87 t | 11.53 t | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Fiji or Finland?
- Fiji, at 0 t against 0 t in Finland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Fiji and Finland?
- 0 t, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Finland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Fiji and Finland rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Fiji ranks 98th and Finland ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.