Germany vs Sweden: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Germany
0 t
in 2024
Sweden
0 t
in 2024
Germany rank
98th
Sweden rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Germany
- Sweden
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.
Germany ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 61.23 t | 1,021 t | 959.42 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 36.57 t | 891.35 t | 854.78 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 127.97 t | 3,627 t | 3,499 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 85.32 t | 0 t | 85.32 t | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Germany or Sweden?
- Germany, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Germany and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Germany and Sweden rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Germany ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.