Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues

Guinea-Bissau
14,894 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
24,969 t
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau rank
57th
Zimbabwe rank
55th

Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Zimbabwe
0500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M199020072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 24,969 t against 14,894 t in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 10,075 t.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.7 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 220 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 689,527 t 967,823 t 278,296 t Zimbabwe
2000s 139,627 t 163,071 t 23,443 t Zimbabwe
2010s 17,113 t 38,938 t 21,826 t Zimbabwe
2020s 8,976 t 12,135 t 3,159 t Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Guinea-Bissau or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 24,969 t against 14,894 t in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
10,075 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 57th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/guinea-bissau/zimbabwe/">Guinea-Bissau vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.