Isle of Man vs Latvia: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Isle of Man
0 t
in 2024
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Isle of Man rank
98th
Latvia rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Isle of Man
- Latvia
How they compare
Isle of Man currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Isle of Man ranks 98th and Latvia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1258 t | 1,178 t | 1,178 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.7296 t | 5,140 t | 5,140 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t | 1,367 t | 1,367 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 71.19 t | 71.19 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Isle of Man or Latvia?
- Isle of Man, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Isle of Man and Latvia?
- 0 t, with Isle of Man ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Isle of Man and Latvia rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Isle of Man ranks 98th and Latvia ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.