Libya vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Libya
0 t
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 t
in 2024
Libya rank
98th
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Libya
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.47 t | 1,086 t | 1,064 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2000s | 0 t | 68.24 t | 68.24 t | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Libya or Turkmenistan?
- Libya, at 0 t against 0 t in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Libya and Turkmenistan?
- 0 t, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Libya ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.