Mauritius vs Switzerland: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Switzerland
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
98th
Switzerland rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Mauritius
- Switzerland
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Switzerland ahead.
Mauritius ranks 98th and Switzerland ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.87 t | 17.14 t | 11.26 t | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 0 t | 35.51 t | 35.51 t | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 0 t | 28.41 t | 28.41 t | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0 t | 0 t | 0 t | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Mauritius or Switzerland?
- Mauritius, at 0 t against 0 t in Switzerland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Mauritius and Switzerland?
- 0 t, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Switzerland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Switzerland rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Mauritius ranks 98th and Switzerland ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.