Norway vs Uruguay: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Norway
0 t
in 2024
Uruguay
0 t
in 2024
Norway rank
98th
Uruguay rank
98th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Norway
- Uruguay
How they compare
Norway currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Uruguay, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
Norway ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,239 t | 3,085 t | 1,846 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 3,405 t | 1,916 t | 1,490 t | Norway |
| 2010s | 327.6 t | 225.26 t | 102.34 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 t | 1,246 t | 1,246 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Norway or Uruguay?
- Norway, at 0 t against 0 t in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Norway and Uruguay?
- 0 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Uruguay rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Norway ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.