Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues
Serbia
12,845 t
in 2024
Zimbabwe
24,969 t
in 2024
Serbia rank
58th
Zimbabwe rank
55th
Woody savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Serbia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 24,969 t against 12,845 t in Serbia, a difference of 12,124 t.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.9 times Serbia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 220 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11,444 t | 38,714 t | 27,269 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5,145 t | 38,938 t | 33,794 t | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 4,414 t | 12,135 t | 7,721 t | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues, Serbia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 24,969 t against 12,845 t in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 12,124 t, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues?
- Serbia ranks 58th and Zimbabwe ranks 55th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.