How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?

19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Montenegro: Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … unit

Chile

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Montenegro

0 t per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile rank

62nd

Montenegro rank

63rd

Woody savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … unit over time

Chile
Montenegro

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Montenegro, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.

Chile ranks 62nd and Montenegro ranks 63rd of 184 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Montenegro	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Montenegro
2010s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Montenegro
2020s	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	0 t per US$ of GDP	Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), Chile or Montenegro?: Chile, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Montenegro as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter) between Chile and Montenegro?: 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for woody savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter)?: Chile ranks 62nd and Montenegro ranks 63rd of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Montenegro: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/montenegro/">Chile vs Montenegro: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), per unit of GDP
Unit: t per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 186 places, 6,239 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Woody savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.