New Zealand vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate
New Zealand
-100 % change on previous year
in 2022
Turkmenistan
-100 % change on previous year
in 2001
New Zealand rank
99th
Turkmenistan rank
99th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate over time
- New Zealand
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 99th and Turkmenistan ranks 99th of 161 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate, New Zealand or Turkmenistan?
- New Zealand, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate between New Zealand and Turkmenistan?
- 0 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turkmenistan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 1997.
- How do New Zealand and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), annual growth rate?
- New Zealand ranks 99th and Turkmenistan ranks 99th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.