Austria vs Belgium: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Austria
0 kt
in 2024
Belgium
0 kt
in 2024
Austria rank
98th
Belgium rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Austria
- Belgium
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Belgium, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Austria ranks 98th and Belgium ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0005 kt | Austria |
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0002 kt | Austria |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Austria or Belgium?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Belgium as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Austria and Belgium?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Belgium?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Belgium rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Austria ranks 98th and Belgium ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.