Austria vs Uruguay: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Austria
0 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0 kt
in 2024
Austria rank
98th
Uruguay rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Austria
- Uruguay
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
Austria ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0071 kt | 0.0069 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0044 kt | 0.0038 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0003 kt | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0029 kt | 0.0028 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Austria or Uruguay?
- Austria, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Austria and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Austria and Uruguay rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Austria ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.