Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Belgium or Sao Tome and Principe?

Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.

How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe?

25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belgium vs Sao Tome and Principe: Woody savanna — Emissions

Belgium

0 kt

in 2024

Sao Tome and Principe

0 kt

in 2024

Belgium rank

98th

Sao Tome and Principe rank

98th

Woody savanna — Emissions over time

Belgium
Sao Tome and Principe

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Belgium ranks 98th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 98th of 220 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belgium	Sao Tome and Principe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0001 kt	0 kt	0.0001 kt	Belgium
2010s	0.0001 kt	0 kt	0 kt	Belgium
2020s	0 kt	0.0001 kt	0.0001 kt	Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Belgium or Sao Tome and Principe?: Belgium, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe?: 0 kt, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe?: 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Belgium and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?: Belgium ranks 98th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Sao Tome and Principe: Woody savanna — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/belgium/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/belgium/sao-tome-and-principe/">Belgium vs Sao Tome and Principe: Woody savanna — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.