Burkina Faso vs Sweden: Woody savanna — Emissions
Burkina Faso
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
98th
Sweden rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Burkina Faso
- Sweden
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.23 kt | 0.0023 kt | 2.23 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0.2351 kt | 0.0021 kt | 0.2331 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0083 kt | 0.0083 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Burkina Faso or Sweden?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Burkina Faso and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sweden?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Sweden rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.