China, Hong Kong SAR vs Fiji: Woody savanna — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Fiji
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
98th
Fiji rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Fiji
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Fiji, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Fiji ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Fiji ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0015 kt | 0.0025 kt | 0.001 kt | Fiji |
| 2000s | 0.0019 kt | 0.0023 kt | 0.0004 kt | Fiji |
| 2010s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0036 kt | 0.0027 kt | Fiji |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0007 kt | Fiji |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Fiji?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Fiji as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Fiji?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Fiji?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Fiji rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Fiji ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.