Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Finland?

China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Finland as of 2024.

What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?

0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?

35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Finland: Woody savanna — Emissions

China, Hong Kong SAR

0 kt

in 2024

Finland

0 kt

in 2024

China, Hong Kong SAR rank

98th

Finland rank

98th

Woody savanna — Emissions over time

China, Hong Kong SAR
Finland

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Finland, a difference of 0 kt.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Finland ranks 98th of 220 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	China, Hong Kong SAR	Finland	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0015 kt	0.0037 kt	0.0022 kt	Finland
2000s	0.0019 kt	0.0126 kt	0.0107 kt	Finland
2010s	0.0009 kt	0.0041 kt	0.0032 kt	Finland
2020s	0 kt	0.0006 kt	0.0006 kt	Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Finland?: China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?: 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland?: 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Finland rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?: China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 98th and Finland ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Finland: Woody savanna — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/finland/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Finland: Woody savanna — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 273 places, 9,329 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed: 12 August 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.