Eritrea vs Kazakhstan: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Eritrea
0 kt
in 2024
Kazakhstan
0 kt
in 2024
Eritrea rank
98th
Kazakhstan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Eritrea
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.
Eritrea ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0095 kt | 0.3798 kt | 0.3703 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0364 kt | 0.036 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0037 kt | 0.0037 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0085 kt | 0.0085 kt | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Eritrea or Kazakhstan?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 0 kt, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Kazakhstan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Eritrea ranks 98th and Kazakhstan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.