Eritrea vs Sweden: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4)
Eritrea
0 kt
in 2024
Sweden
0 kt
in 2024
Eritrea rank
98th
Sweden rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) over time
- Eritrea
- Sweden
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0095 kt | 0.0018 kt | 0.0077 kt | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0021 kt | 0.0016 kt | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0083 kt | 0.0083 kt | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Eritrea or Sweden?
- Eritrea, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Eritrea and Sweden?
- 0 kt, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Sweden rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Eritrea ranks 98th and Sweden ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.