Finland vs Turkmenistan: Woody savanna — Emissions
Finland
0 kt
in 2024
Turkmenistan
0 kt
in 2024
Finland rank
98th
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Finland
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0032 kt | 0.0025 kt | 0.0007 kt | Finland |
| 2000s | 0.0126 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0124 kt | Finland |
| 2010s | 0.0041 kt | 0 kt | 0.0041 kt | Finland |
| 2020s | 0.0006 kt | 0 kt | 0.0006 kt | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Finland or Turkmenistan?
- Finland, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Turkmenistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Finland and Turkmenistan?
- 0 kt, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Turkmenistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Turkmenistan rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Finland ranks 98th and Turkmenistan ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.