Latvia vs Solomon Islands: Woody savanna — Emissions
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Solomon Islands
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia rank
98th
Solomon Islands rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Latvia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 98th and Solomon Islands ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0027 kt | 0 kt | 0.0027 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0118 kt | 0 kt | 0.0118 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0031 kt | 0 kt | 0.0031 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Latvia or Solomon Islands?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Latvia and Solomon Islands?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Solomon Islands?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Solomon Islands rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 98th and Solomon Islands ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.