Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Woody savanna — Emissions
Sri Lanka
0.0006 kt
in 2024
Tunisia
0.0005 kt
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
91st
Tunisia rank
92nd
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.0006 kt against 0.0005 kt in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 3 and Tunisia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0372 kt | 0.002 kt | 0.0352 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.048 kt | 0.0007 kt | 0.0474 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0211 kt | 0.0013 kt | 0.0198 kt | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0021 kt | 0.0023 kt | 0.0002 kt | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.0006 kt against 0.0005 kt in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 0.0001 kt, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Sri Lanka ranks 91st and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.