Turkmenistan vs Uruguay: Woody savanna — Emissions
Turkmenistan
0 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0 kt
in 2024
Turkmenistan rank
98th
Uruguay rank
98th
Woody savanna — Emissions over time
- Turkmenistan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Turkmenistan ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Turkmenistan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0025 kt | 0.0079 kt | 0.0054 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0044 kt | 0.0042 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.0029 kt | 0.0029 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions, Turkmenistan or Uruguay?
- Turkmenistan, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions between Turkmenistan and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Uruguay?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Turkmenistan and Uruguay rank globally for woody savanna — emissions?
- Turkmenistan ranks 98th and Uruguay ranks 98th of 220 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.