Australia vs Eswatini: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Australia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Eswatini
0 kt per person
in 2024
Australia rank
24th
Eswatini rank
27th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Australia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 24th and Eswatini ranks 27th of 187 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Australia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Australia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita, Australia or Eswatini?
- Australia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita between Australia and Eswatini?
- 0 kt per person, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Eswatini?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Eswatini rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Australia ranks 24th and Eswatini ranks 27th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.