Brazil vs Guatemala: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Brazil
0 kt per person
in 2024
Guatemala
0 kt per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
18th
Guatemala rank
20th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Brazil
- Guatemala
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guatemala, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.4 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Brazil ranks 18th and Guatemala ranks 20th of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Guatemala | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita, Brazil or Guatemala?
- Brazil, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita between Brazil and Guatemala?
- 0 kt per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guatemala?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Guatemala rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Brazil ranks 18th and Guatemala ranks 20th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.