Burundi vs Tunisia: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Burundi
0 kt per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0 kt per person
in 2024
Burundi rank
86th
Tunisia rank
83rd
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Burundi
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Burundi, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.9 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 86th and Tunisia ranks 83rd of 187 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Burundi |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Burundi |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita, Burundi or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Burundi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita between Burundi and Tunisia?
- 0 kt per person, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burundi and Tunisia rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Burundi ranks 86th and Tunisia ranks 83rd of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.