Kazakhstan vs Lithuania: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Kazakhstan
0 kt per person
in 2024
Lithuania
0 kt per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
90th
Lithuania rank
90th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Lithuania
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Lithuania ranks 90th of 187 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita, Kazakhstan or Lithuania?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita between Kazakhstan and Lithuania?
- 0 kt per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Lithuania?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and Lithuania rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 90th and Lithuania ranks 90th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.