Mozambique vs World: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Mozambique
0 kt per person
in 2024
World
0 kt per person
in 2024
Mozambique rank
4th
World rank
1st
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Mozambique
- World
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in World, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 13.6 times World's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 4th and World ranks 1st of 187 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Mozambique |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Mozambique |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita, Mozambique or World?
- Mozambique, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in World as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita between Mozambique and World?
- 0 kt per person, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and World?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mozambique and World rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Mozambique ranks 4th and World ranks 1st of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.