Pakistan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre

Pakistan
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
86th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
86th

Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre over time

  • Pakistan
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0000199020062023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 86th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 86th of 187 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre, Pakistan or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Pakistan, at 0 kt per square kilometre against 0 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre between Pakistan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per square kilometre?
Pakistan ranks 86th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 86th of 187 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/woody-savanna-emissions-ch4-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Pakistan vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 6,279 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.