Afghanistan vs Eritrea: Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP
Afghanistan
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Afghanistan rank
89th
Eritrea rank
89th
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP over time
- Afghanistan
- Eritrea
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 89th and Eritrea ranks 89th of 184 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp, Afghanistan or Eritrea?
- Afghanistan, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp between Afghanistan and Eritrea?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Eritrea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2011.
- How do Afghanistan and Eritrea rank globally for woody savanna — emissions (ch4), per unit of gdp?
- Afghanistan ranks 89th and Eritrea ranks 89th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Woody savanna — Emissions (CH4) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.